What Compass sees well — and what it doesn't
Every instrument has a field of view. Compass reads a curated slice of the technology press, so some topics are covered more deeply than others. Rather than hide that, we measure it: here is how coverage distributes across the field — and the terms surfacing across the press that aren't yet tracked entities. It's a measurement of our own blind spots, not a verdict.
How coverage distributes across the field
Each topic's share of everything in view, set against an even slice — what each of the 7 topics would hold if coverage were perfectly flat (14 %). Past the marker is deeper-than-even coverage; well short of it is thin. Plain shares, nothing inferred.
The blind-spot harvest
High-frequency terms the technology press keeps surfacing that aren't yet canonical entities in Compass — sized by how often they appear. They're candidates: the leading edge of where coverage may widen next. Raw counts, nothing inferred — hover any term for its last-seen date.
This is the coverage-honesty stance made literal: Compass tells you where it's strong and where it isn't, by topic, with numbers. A measured field of view beats an unstated one.