Replacing ministral-14b-2512?
Ranked replacement candidates, each shown with exactly what changes if you switch. Same-provider matches surface first because switching cost is lower; capability regressions are flagged in red.
ministral-14b-2512
| Field | ministral-14b-2512 | → | ministral-3b-2512 | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2/M | → | $0.1/M | Save 50% |
| Output price | $0.2/M | → | $0.1/M | Save 50% |
| Lifecycle | Active | → | Active | Same status |
How candidates are ranked
Candidates are ranked by how much of the source model's profile each one preserves — weighing switching cost (same provider or model family surface first), capability parity (what you keep versus what you'd lose), context window, and pricing direction. A candidate that is itself deprecated is pushed down the list; one that's already retired is never recommended.
Ranking is purely algorithmic — no editorial weighting, no paid placement. Every value is pulled from each provider's own documentation; click any model name to see the source-linked detail.