Replacing Llama 4 Scout?
Ranked replacement candidates, each shown with exactly what changes if you switch. Same-provider matches surface first because switching cost is lower; capability regressions are flagged in red.
Llama 4 Scout
| Field | Llama 4 Scout | → | Llama 4 Behemoth | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.08/M | → | — | Candidate price not verified |
| Output price | $0.3/M | → | — | Candidate price not verified |
| Context window | 10M tokens | → | — | One value not verified |
| Vision input | ✓ supported | → | ✓ supported | Preserved |
| Lifecycle | Active | → | Preview | Preview / limited access |
Llama 4 Maverick
MetaHow candidates are ranked
Candidates are ranked by how much of the source model's profile each one preserves — weighing switching cost (same provider or model family surface first), capability parity (what you keep versus what you'd lose), context window, and pricing direction. A candidate that is itself deprecated is pushed down the list; one that's already retired is never recommended.
Ranking is purely algorithmic — no editorial weighting, no paid placement. Every value is pulled from each provider's own documentation; click any model name to see the source-linked detail.