Replacing Llama 4 Behemoth?
Ranked replacement candidates, each shown with exactly what changes if you switch. Same-provider matches surface first because switching cost is lower; capability regressions are flagged in red.
Llama 4 Behemoth
| Field | Llama 4 Behemoth | → | Llama 4 Maverick | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | → | $0.15/M | Source price not verified |
| Output price | — | → | $0.6/M | Source price not verified |
| Context window | — | → | 1M tokens | One value not verified |
| Vision input | ✓ supported | → | ✓ supported | Preserved |
| Lifecycle | Preview | → | Active | Generally available |
How candidates are ranked
Candidates are ranked by how much of the source model's profile each one preserves — weighing switching cost (same provider or model family surface first), capability parity (what you keep versus what you'd lose), context window, and pricing direction. A candidate that is itself deprecated is pushed down the list; one that's already retired is never recommended.
Ranking is purely algorithmic — no editorial weighting, no paid placement. Every value is pulled from each provider's own documentation; click any model name to see the source-linked detail.