Migration assistant

Replacing Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Ranked replacement candidates, each shown with exactly what changes if you switch. Same-provider matches surface first because switching cost is lower; capability regressions are flagged in red.

ME
Migrating from

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta · Active
Input: $0.03/M Output: $0.2/M Context: —
View detail →
#1 RECOMMENDED

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Meta
same provider; 26% cheaper input
View full detail →
What changes if you switch
Field Llama 3.2 1B Instruct → Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Impact
Input price $0.03/M → $0.02/M Save 26%
Output price $0.2/M → $0.05/M Save 75%
Lifecycle Active → Active Same status
Other candidates
#2

Llama 3 8B Instruct

Meta
same provider; 48% more expensive input
Details →
Input price: +48% more expensiveOutput price: Save 80%
#3

Llama Guard 3 8B

Meta
same provider; 1693% more expensive input
Details →
Input price: +1693% more expensiveOutput price: Save 85%
#4

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta
same provider; 567% more expensive input
Details →
Input price: +567% more expensiveOutput price: Save 10%
#5

Llama 4 Behemoth

Meta
same provider
Details →
Lifecycle: Preview / limited access
Methodology

How candidates are ranked

Candidates are ranked by how much of the source model's profile each one preserves — weighing switching cost (same provider or model family surface first), capability parity (what you keep versus what you'd lose), context window, and pricing direction. A candidate that is itself deprecated is pushed down the list; one that's already retired is never recommended.

Ranking is purely algorithmic — no editorial weighting, no paid placement. Every value is pulled from each provider's own documentation; click any model name to see the source-linked detail.