Migration assistant

Replacing GPT-5 Pro?

Ranked replacement candidates, each shown with exactly what changes if you switch. Same-provider matches surface first because switching cost is lower; capability regressions are flagged in red.

OP
Migrating from

GPT-5 Pro

OpenAI · GPT-5 · Active
Input: $15/M Output: $120/M Context: 400K
View detail →
🔔
Don't get caught off guard next time.
This is the scramble AI Stack Watch is built to prevent. Put GPT-5 Pro in a monitored client workspace and we'll tell you — with the source — the moment it's deprecated, repriced, or out-shipped by a candidate, while there's still time to plan the move.
Monitor this in a client workspace →
#1 RECOMMENDED

GPT-5 Mini

OpenAI · GPT-5
same provider; same family; 98% cheaper input; same context window
View full detail →
What changes if you switch
Field GPT-5 Pro GPT-5 Mini Impact
Input price $15/M $0.25/M Save 98%
Output price $120/M $2/M Save 98%
Context window 400K tokens 400K tokens Same capacity
Vision input ✓ supported ✓ supported Preserved
Function calling ✓ supported ✓ supported Preserved
Structured output (JSON) ✓ supported ✓ supported Preserved
Lifecycle Active Active Same status
Other candidates
#2

GPT-5 Nano

OpenAI
same provider; same family; 100% cheaper input; same context window
Details →
Input price: Save 100%Output price: Save 100%
#3

GPT-4.1 Mini

OpenAI
same provider; 97% cheaper input; 1M context (larger)
Details →
Input price: Save 97%Output price: Save 99%Context window: +162% larger
#4

GPT-4.1 Nano

OpenAI
same provider; 99% cheaper input; 1M context (larger)
Details →
Input price: Save 99%Output price: Save 100%Context window: +162% larger
#5

GPT-5.4 Mini

OpenAI
same provider; 95% cheaper input; same context window
Details →
Input price: Save 95%Output price: Save 96%
Methodology

How candidates are ranked

Candidates are ranked by how much of the source model's profile each one preserves — weighing switching cost (same provider or model family surface first), capability parity (what you keep versus what you'd lose), context window, and pricing direction. A candidate that is itself deprecated is pushed down the list; one that's already retired is never recommended.

Ranking is purely algorithmic — no editorial weighting, no paid placement. Every value is pulled from each provider's own documentation; click any model name to see the source-linked detail.